Meet Shirley Hailstock- A Writer’s Use of Television

Please welcome Shirley Hailstock to the blog … discussing one of my favorite topics. Television!

LEGACY

I don’t watch much television.  At least I didn’t think I watched a lot of it.  But I’ve discovered I watch a lot of television.  I can write through the noise.  Growing up with a lot of sisters and one brother, the television, record player (we had records then), and radio could all be going at once, not to mention conversations.  I learned to either tune it out or work with it.

I thought working with television began when CSI-Crime Scene Investigation debuted on the small screen.  They would show what happened inside the body when an event occurred, like a bullet penetrating a lung.  I thought of it as research, giving myself permission to watch it for writing purposes.  But then I remembered back when I was in high school, I used to used Walt Disney Presents (Sunday nights at 8:00) to write my book reports.  It wasn’t until later that I discovered books and movies were different.  Luckily, I stuck with the legends, so I was all right.

Going to the movies was something a friend and I did often when I lived in D.C.  When the movie ended and everyone else was leaving the theater, my friend and I were still sitting there after the credits rolled, discussing the film, its meaning, what was true, possible, or impossible.  It wasn’t just what Hollywood had sent us.  We’d dissect it every part of it.  And this was long before I began writing and dissecting what made a good book.  I didn’t know it at the time, but sitting in that theater, analyzing what happened, was training for becoming a writer.

Movies also sent me to books.  If a story was intriguing, I often wanted to know more about the characters portrayed or I wanted to know what was in the book that didn’t translate to the screen.  By now I’d learned that what I saw was only a fraction of what a book could tell me.  These were often biographies.  I wanted to separate the truth from fiction.  Amadeus was one of the first ones I watched and went almost immediately to the library to check out several books on the life of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.  Mozart isn’t my favorite classical pianist.  That would be Chopin, but the story behind Amadeus was so intriguing that despite the wonderful music, I wanted to know more about the man and his relationship with his wife, his absent mother and his stern father.

Books also sent me to learn more about other people’s lives.  The book Emily’s Secret by Jill Jones led me to learn more about the Bronte’s.  Emily’s Secret, a work of fiction, was recommended by the publisher through a teaser booklet.  I read the teaser and then haunted bookstores until the book was released.  After reading it, I discovered it was one of those books that you tell everyone they have got to read.

But let’s go back to television.  I’m not a reality fan, but I watch some shows for the science or the technology.  McGyver and his ingenious use of whatever was available was one of my favorites.  I was a chemistry major in college and still wondered if some of the improvised concoctions he used would work.  Years after it went off the air, there was another program where they tried the physics and chemistry of McGyver.  Most of it didn’t work.  However, the takeaway from this is that there are things my characters can do with only what is available.  And before you ask, no, I never used anything I saw McGyver do on television in my books.  But he was certainly good to look at.  And still is.

Today I watch Scandal with Kerry Washington.  She’s a fixer.  Until I saw Michael Clayton with George Clooney, I’d never heard of a fixer.  I thought they’d have a sexier name.  I can’t think what, just that they would.  The problems they have and the solutions they come up with are amazing.  As a writer, it’s a not to be missed program.  And of course, NCIS is on my list program that I watch over and over again.

So, when readers ask me where did the idea for a book came from, sometimes it came from something I saw on television.  Of course, it’s not exactly the same, but the germ of the plot can spark an entire book.  Sometimes only one line in a movie gives me an idea for a story.  I have to quickly write it down, so I won’t forget it.  Once I got the idea for a book from a bumper sticker on the back of a truck.  All it said was Summer Thunder.  I thought of writing a book about the permanent residents of a summer resort.  They referred to the influx of hard bodies during the season as Summer Thunder.  It’s still in the idea file, waiting for me to write it.

The idea for my latest book, LEGACY, did not consciously come from any television program.  However, it’s about Michael Lawrence, a traumatized attorney, whose turned his back on the law and escaped to a solitary life in the Maryland mountains.  Discovering he is heir to a fortune, he can only claim it if he returns to the city and works with Erika St. James, the beautiful new president of a multinational corporation.  While his thoughts of her stray from the boardroom to the bedroom, someone else has plans to make him pay for past deeds.  And Erika is the pawn he’ll use to force Michael into his crosshairs.  If I think about the programs I’ve watch in the past, I could give a small amount of credit to Dynasty.  That’s only because of the money and the businesses they are running together.  And there is a combination of the women protagonist and antagonist in the character of Erika.

I hope you enjoy it.

sth3b

Shirley Hailstock is the past president of Romance Writers of America.  She writes contemporary romance for Kensington and Harlequin and is the author of 30 novels and novellas.  Her latest e-book released is LEGACY.

Facebook – www.facebook.com/shailstock

 

Twitter – @shailstock

Website – http://www.shirleyhailstock.net

Newsletter – http://www.yahoogroups.com

 

On Writing: When Characters like Damien Stark Stand Up and Demand to Be Heard

Everyday eBook Character Creation article by J. Kenner I’m over at Everyday eBook today sharing some thoughts on writing; specifically, I’m talking about character creation and erotic romance.

I’m riffing off of the general idea that “erotic romance stems from the same place as other novels – from the characters and from the situation. And if that situation is a bit steamy … well, that’s just all the more fun!”

Come on over and read the rest of my thoughts, particularly as they relate to Damien and Nikki from Release Me, Claim Me, and Complete Me!

And don’t forget the contest that I have going! Check it out if you’re interested in winning an early read of Claim Me, book two in the Stark Trilogy!  You can learn all about it here (and please share with your friends! the prizes have the potential to grow!)


P.S. - If you enjoy romance with a magical twist, my award-winning THE CAT'S FANCY is currently on sale for only 99 cents!  And it's also in the top 10 of several of the Kindle romance charts!  Woot!

And as a cool bonus, it's the prequel to my fun series of superhero romances that began with the USA Today bestseller Aphrodite's Kiss!  

I hope you check out The Cat's Fancy!

P.P.S. And why not scroll down and share the post? After all, sharing is sexy! XXOO

--J.K.


Quality is Key: Guest Blogger SaraLynn Hoyt Discusses Indie Books

SaraLynnHoytI’m excited to host Sheryl Hoyt (who is writing as SaraLynn Hoyt) on today’s stop on her blog tour today!  

If you recognize her name, that may be because you read about her in a recent Time Magazine article focusing on the rise and success of indie authors.  

It’s a topic that fascinates me as I am very happily and very well-published by a traditional New York publisher.  But I’m also getting my feet wet as an indie  author by putting up my backlist and (soon) adding new indie books to pre-existing series that were discontinued before I was ready to stop writing them!

SaraLynn’s article focuses on the question of quality, from her perspective as an indie book author and a reader.  So, without further ado, please welcome SaraLynn!


Recently, I was featured in an article in the 12/10/12 issue of Time Magazine, entitled “The 99¢ Best Seller” where journalist Andrew Rice wrote about my self-publishing journey.

When I started down this road of self-publishing, I knew there was a stigma attached to what used to be called vanity press. Thank goodness for the Kindle
and a new attitude about self-publishing or as Andrew said in his article, I’d still be pitching to NY waiting for some overworked, underpaid editor to pick my book off the slush pile.

With that said, what is the biggest criticism Indie authors are still subjected to?  That the quality of Indie books is lower than NY published books. But it doesn’t have to be that way. Besides, I’ve never seen a perfect book, not ever. I’m not just a writer, I’m a reader and I’ve read a lot of NY Times bestselling books published by the Big Six and there is always at least one typo— usually more— and some of the editing, let’s admit, is not always so great.Dangerous Heart by SaraLynn Hoyt

I remember reading one of my favorite authors after she’d had many books published and I honestly wondered if the editor had all of a sudden decided that since she was a best-selling author, there was now no need to edit her books any longer because people would buy them regardless of how crappily they had been written. No offense to the author since, after all, that is why we have editors, beta readers and critique partners.

I won’t go into more details here on badly edited books I’ve read from the Big Six, but I think we’ve all seen ‘em. <wink>

So the truth is Indie authors can actually have a higher quality product if they want. Plus, Indie authors can actually fix any errors that readers find! How great is that? If a NY pubbed author finds and error in their book— like let’s say the hero’s name is Tom in the printed copy and Tom turns into Ted once or twice—what can they do? Nothing…hope for a second printing? That’s about it. However, as an Indie author, I can simply fix the error and re-upload my book. Problem solved.

Heaven Made by SaraLynn HoytSo how do I publish the highest quality book I can? I follow these steps:

  • Write a book that I would want to read.
  • Make sure my research is tight.
  • Rewrite the book multiple times.
  • Have an honest critique partner tell me what I need to fix.
  • Fix the stuff my honest critique partner has told me about! (Don’t skip this step no matter how much you want to!)
  • Put the book away for a week or two or three, then sit down and read it through in one or two sittings and DO NOT MAKE EDITS. This is where you find out if your book reads smoothly and is ready for the final process or not.
  • Now you can go back and make all your final edits before you hire an editor.
  • Hire a professional editor and wait.
  • Make edits suggested by editor (that’s what you paid them for).
  • Spellcheck.
  • Find a Beta reader and have them make comments and ask questions, find errors etc.
  • Make edits based on Beta readers’ comments.
  • Do a final read thru and fix any errors you find.

If you follow these steps, you will have a very high quality product to put on sale that you can be proud of. My only caution is at some point you will need to stop editing and be satisfied with all your hard work.

As writers, we could potentially keep rewriting and improving forever. Instead, write another book and start the process over again. Your fans will be happy you did, because not only do they want a quality book, but they want lots of quality books. Happy writing!

Sheryl Hoyt was born and lives in the Seattle, WA area. She resides in the beautiful Cascade foothills with her high school sweetheart and their cats. A business professional by day, Sheryl has been writing novels in her free time for over 20 years. A lover of all things historical, she enjoys research and travel in order to expand her knowledge and add authenticity to her stories.  You can find her on Twitter and Facebook, and lots of other social media outlets.  Visit her website to learn more!


Thanks so much for being here today, SaraLynn!

Okay, readers, what say you?  Are you an author of indie books?  Avid readers?  Do you have thoughts about SaraLynn’s suggestions for making sure you work is of the highest quality?

As for me, I think the list is an excellent one.  Even so, I’ll raise my hand and start the conversation rolling by saying that I disagree that fixing the stuff your critique partner and/or editor flags is a must-do. Honestly consider it? Yes.  Realize that something you wrote gave them pause, yes.  But that may not translate to taking their actual advice as to either the problem or the solution.  What do I mean?  Well, that’s too much to go into here … but thanks to SaraLynn, I think I’ve pinpointed a blog post for later this week … so stay tuned!

Be sure to share your thoughts below!


P.S. - If you enjoy romance with a magical twist, my award-winning THE CAT'S FANCY is currently on sale for only 99 cents!  And it's also in the top 10 of several of the Kindle romance charts!  Woot!

And as a cool bonus, it's the prequel to my fun series of superhero romances that began with the USA Today bestseller Aphrodite's Kiss!  

I hope you check out The Cat's Fancy!

P.P.S. And why not scroll down and share the post? After all, sharing is sexy! XXOO

--J.K.


Scene Rescue: When Collaborators Disagree—And Live To Tell The Tale

I’m so excited that Ruth The Chanel Caper CoverHarris is guest-blogging today!  Ruth is a New York Times and ebook bestselling author of romantic women’s fiction. With her husband, Michael, she writes thrillers. (How cool is that?)  Coming up soon is The Chanel Caper, a romantic comedy-mystery starring a baby boomer couple.

I particularly love Ruth’s description of The Chanel Caper -”chick lit for chicks who weren’t born yesterday.”  It addresses “the two most important questions of our time: 1) Is there sex after marriage? 2) Is sixty the new forty?” (I hope so, because that puts me back in my twenties!  Whoo-hoo!)

Ruth is blogging about collaboration.  I’ve done a couple of collabs now (novels and screenplays) and my experiences have been great, but not without challenges.  Ruth’s insight is awesome! 

Without further ado … here’s Ruth!

Hooked by Ruth and Michael HarrisLove doesn’t always run a smooth path (no kidding!) and neither does collaboration. There are inevitably going to be times when you and your co-author—in my case my DH, Michael—don’t see a character, a scene, even a line of dialogue the same way.

Most of the time while we were writing our thriller, Hooked, Michael and I were in synch but there was one scene about which we had radically different opinions. I hated it so much I deleted it. Michael, appalled, retrieved it from the trash.

The scene occurs midway through the book and involves two characters. One is Gavin Jenkins, the brilliant and charismatic doctor who is at the center of the story. The other is Adriana Partos, a world-famous concert pianist who retired at the request of her lover, billionaire tycoon, Nicky Kiskalesi. Now, however, Nicky misses Adriana’s fame and celebrity and wants her to come out of retirement.

The problem is that a severe arthritic condition has made it impossible for Adriana to play. Nicky, who didn’t get rich by giving up, suggests she consult Gavin Jenkins, a miracle-working celebrity doctor who, it seems, can cure almost anything. Adriana, reluctant but also afraid of losing Nicky, agrees to meet with Gavin.

As the scene was originally written, Adriana dislikes Gavin for intuitive reasons: she finds him slick and cold although no specific reasons are given. The scene, based on her instinctive dislike, seemed weak and unconvincing to me: ergo, the delete button. Michael convinced me the scene was necessary and could be made to work.

The question was: how? I trust Michael’s opinions so we had several conversations about why I hated the scene and why he thought it essential. We finally got to an agreement point when we decided that “something” specific had to happen in the scene to validate Adriana’s dislike and distrust of Gavin, a dislike so intense that she slaps him and walks out of his consulting room.

Having no idea of what the “something” was, I went to the computer to rewrite the scene. I took out the language referring to her “intuitive” dislike of his “coldness” and “hidden” personality. When I got to the exact lines that describe Gavin taking her arm in an intimate, almost caressing way & giving her the shot for which he has become known, the words, coming straight from my unconscious to the keyboard, emerged on the screen: “You’ve never felt this good, have you?” he whispers as he presses down on the syringe and the fluid enters her vein.

That brief line of dialogue—completely unanticipated—was a result of our previous conversations about the characters and the scene and gave us the “something” we needed.

In response, Adriana slaps Gavin, he calls her a bitch and tries to give her a second (different) injection but, by then, she has left. The scene ends with her standing outside his office and remembering the bulge in his pants. Had she been seeing things? Imagining things? Or had he had an erection as he administered the shot?

Since we already know about Gavin’s sexual kinks from earlier scenes, we now had a compelling scene that advances the plot, creates conflict between Adriana and the gifted doctor whose help she will need and adds a new dimension to Gavin’s intriguing, mysterious character.

Sometimes disagreement is the friction that produces the pearl. You just have to get from there to here.


J.K. here again:  Thanks so much Ruth!  I’ve had the same experience collaborating — does it make me weird to say that I actually love that disagreement process?  Some of the best scenes come when you push yourself even further, and I think that collaborating often facilitates that.  You’re forced to look at scenes, characters, whatever from a different angle, and that often leads to a new and better perspective!

Readers, you can visit Ruth (and learn more about all of her books!) at her lively blog,  http://ruthharrisblog.blogspot.com/

So tell us, for you writers out there, have you ever tried to collaborate?  For that matter, even you non-writers have probably collaborated on projects (heck, even buying a house is a project between spouses that requires collaboration!  i.e., do you or do you not need that extra bathroom?  hint: the answer is always yes!).  How did it go?  Good experience?  Bad experience?

And don’t forget to enter my holiday contest!

a Rafflecopter giveaway

When the dead stay silent (and other gripes about dialogue)

Michonne from the Walking Dead

A little too closed-mouthed, Michonne???

I’ve become a total fangirl of The Walking Dead, but even total fans can have the occasional gripe and, yeah, I got one.

Minor spoiler alert for what follows! So beware if you read on!

For a show wherein the characters take a lot of time talking about their feelings instead of, oh, fortifying their perimeter and making a plan for where to meet if a herd comes through and they get separated (Season Two, I’m looking at you), those same characters are quite adept at not relaying legitimate information for no reason I can see other than that the screenwriters don’t want it revealed at a particular moment.

Rick’s big secret from the CDC doctor I sorta get. But Carl not mentioning the swamp zombie? They’ve set him up to be impulsive, but not stupid.

I can even forgive that, but Rick not telling Lori exactly what happened with Shane? (And then Lori getting all bent out of shape about the whole Shane thing even though she’s the one who sat Rick down and said that Shane was dangerous? Um, hello?). For folks who spend a lot of time chatting, they managed to talk around the important stuff rather than about it.

But the one that really got me was in Season 3, this last episode. There’s Michonne, who’s witnessed Merle taking Glenn and Maggie. She’s heard that Merle is looking for his brother. She can see that Merle knows Glenn. She knows that he has lost a hand.

So what does she do when she gets to the prison? She entirely and completely fails to mention that Glenn and Maggie were taken by a one-handed man who actually knew Glenn and who was looking for his brother. Why? Because the screenwriters willed it to be so. (And no, I don’t buy that it’s because she’s so close-mouthed naturally; she did tell some information–such as what they said about how to reach the prison–and relaying the rest only strengthens her position that she should be treated as an ally, not a prisoner.)

That’s the kind of thing that pulls me out of movies and books, because it’s so contrary to the way the characters would actually behave. “Just say something!” my husband and I will scream at the TV. “Why the hell doesn’t she (or he) just say X?”

I get that it’s hard as heck sometimes to move the story forward in the way you want it to go if you have to reveal certain things that another character knows. (You also see this in books where you’re in the murderer’s point of view, but he/she never things anything damning. Uh, really?) It’s worth working on those scenes, though, to make the characters feel more real and the scenario more believable.

Here’s the thing, Walking Dead writers: I love the show. I love the characters. But let the characters do the talking and keep the writerly manipulation invisible. Please, please, pretty please!

What about you? Did those scenes bug you, too? Did you notice or just go with the flow? Do you get irritated when you see the writer’s fingers in a book or movie or tv show?